@BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. I'll fix it. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. VMware or VirtualBox) Any kind of solution? I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. can u test ? The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. privacy statement. Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). error was now displayed in 1080p. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. So, this is debatable. Any suggestions, bugs? I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. This means current is UEFI mode. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". Have a question about this project? I think it's OK. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! 2. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. Well occasionally send you account related emails. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. Paragon ExtFS for Windows That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. Sign in openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. Open net installer iso using archive manager in Debian (pre-existing system). And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Well occasionally send you account related emails. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. What's going on here? In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. No bootfile found for UEFI! So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Reply. You can put the iso file any where of the first partition. plzz help. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Does shim still needed in this case? Download non-free firmware archive. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! That's an improvement, I guess? 6. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Getting the same error as @rderooy. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. Option 2: bypass secure boot This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. I have a solution for this. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. if you want can you test this too :) Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. Yes. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. Newbie. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. 1. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. I've already disabled secure boot. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. It . That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. Will there be any? You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. , ctrl+alt+del . Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. debes activar modo uefi en el bios I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. Just some preliminary ideas. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Windows 10 32bit mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago Asks for full pathname of shell. The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. ElementaryOS boots just fine. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. I think it's OK. Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. try 1.0.09 beta1? Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. 2. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. Sorry for my ignorance. Main Edition Support. @blackcrack It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce I have this same problem. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. V4 is legacy version. I will test it in a realmachine later. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Error : @FadeMind UEFi64? @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. Openbsd is based. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. You can use these commands to format it: Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Thank you I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. No bootfile found for UEFI! Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy